Sau Rupali Santosh Mehenge vs Santosh Shriram Mehenge Advocate - CHATARKAR KAILAS DHONDBA — 14/2024

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready Next hearing 29-Jun-2026 this date has passed

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHWS100009392024

e-Filing Number

01-07-2024

Filing Number

771/2024

Filing Date

02-Jul-2024

Registration No

14/2024

Registration Date

02-Jul-2024

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon

Judge

1-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sau Rupali Santosh Mehenge

    Adv. ROKADE DHANANJAY RATNAKAR

  2. 2.Pranjali Santosh Mehenge

    Adv. ROKADE DHANANJAY RATNAKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Shriram Mehenge Advocate - CHATARKAR KAILAS DHONDBA

  2. 2.Shrimati Kasabai Shriram Mehenge

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  4. 22-May-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  5. 08-May-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  10. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  11. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  12. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  13. 21-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  14. 28-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  15. 29-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  16. 09-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  17. 12-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  18. 21-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  19. 11-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  20. 16-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  21. 30-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  22. 21-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  23. 02-May-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  24. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  25. 02-Apr-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 14/2024 Petitioners: Rupali Santosh Mehenge and Pranjali Santosh Mehenge Respondent: Santosh Shriram Mehenge (Advocate) Order: The petition for interim maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 23 was partially allowed. The respondent was ordered to pay ₹10,000 (ten thousand rupees only) as interim maintenance to the petitioner. Key Facts: The petitioner alleged domestic violence, harassment over dowry, beatings, and threats by the respondent and his family members. The petitioner and her minor daughter (Pranjali) are currently living separately at her maternal home. The respondent, employed in police service with monthly income of ₹80,000 and assets including property worth ₹50,00,000, contested all allegations. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and considered the respondent's financial capacity, necessitating interim financial support for the petitioner and child's maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  26. 02-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  27. 25-Mar-2025

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  28. 12-Mar-2025

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  29. 24-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  30. 12-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  31. 18-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  32. 08-Jan-2025

    Filing of Affidavit

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  33. 04-Jan-2025

    Filing of Affidavit

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  34. 23-Dec-2024

    Filing of Affidavit

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  35. 07-Dec-2024

    Filing of Affidavit

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  36. 12-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  37. 21-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  38. 08-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  39. 06-Sep-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  40. 05-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon

  41. 02-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 02-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 14/2024 Petitioners: Rupali Santosh Mehenge and Pranjali Santosh Mehenge Respondent: Santosh Shriram Mehenge (Advocate) Order: The petition for interim maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 23 was partially allowed. The respondent was ordered to pay ₹10,000 (ten thousand rupees only) as interim maintenance to the petitioner. Key Facts: The petitioner alleged domestic violence, harassment over dowry, beatings, and threats by the respondent and his family members. The petitioner and her minor daughter (Pranjali) are currently living separately at her maternal home. The respondent, employed in police service with monthly income of ₹80,000 and assets including property worth ₹50,00,000, contested all allegations. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and considered the respondent's financial capacity, necessitating interim financial support for the petitioner and child's maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case