Sau Rupali Santosh Mehenge vs Santosh Shriram Mehenge Advocate - CHATARKAR KAILAS DHONDBA — 14/2024

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHWS100009392024

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

e-Filing Number

01-07-2024

Filing Number

771/2024

Filing Date

02-07-2024

Registration No

14/2024

Registration Date

02-07-2024

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23

Petitioner(s)

Sau Rupali Santosh Mehenge

Adv. ROKADE DHANANJAY RATNAKAR

Pranjali Santosh Mehenge

Adv. ROKADE DHANANJAY RATNAKAR

Respondent(s)

Santosh Shriram Mehenge Advocate - CHATARKAR KAILAS DHONDBA

Shrimati Kasabai Shriram Mehenge

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON

12-06-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

01-06-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

22-05-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

08-05-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

30-04-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

02-04-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 14/2024 Petitioners: Rupali Santosh Mehenge and Pranjali Santosh Mehenge Respondent: Santosh Shriram Mehenge (Advocate) Order: The petition for interim maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 23 was partially allowed. The respondent was ordered to pay ₹10,000 (ten thousand rupees only) as interim maintenance to the petitioner. Key Facts: The petitioner alleged domestic violence, harassment over dowry, beatings, and threats by the respondent and his family members. The petitioner and her minor daughter (Pranjali) are currently living separately at her maternal home. The respondent, employed in police service with monthly income of ₹80,000 and assets including property worth ₹50,00,000, contested all allegations. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and considered the respondent's financial capacity, necessitating interim financial support for the petitioner and child's maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 14/2024 Petitioners: Rupali Santosh Mehenge and Pranjali Santosh Mehenge Respondent: Santosh Shriram Mehenge (Advocate) Order: The petition for interim maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 23 was partially allowed. The respondent was ordered to pay ₹10,000 (ten thousand rupees only) as interim maintenance to the petitioner. Key Facts: The petitioner alleged domestic violence, harassment over dowry, beatings, and threats by the respondent and his family members. The petitioner and her minor daughter (Pranjali) are currently living separately at her maternal home. The respondent, employed in police service with monthly income of ₹80,000 and assets including property worth ₹50,00,000, contested all allegations. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and considered the respondent's financial capacity, necessitating interim financial support for the petitioner and child's maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case