Sau Rupali Santosh Mehenge vs Santosh Shriram Mehenge Advocate - CHATARKAR KAILAS DHONDBA — 14/2024
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHWS100009392024
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
e-Filing Number
01-07-2024
Filing Number
771/2024
Filing Date
02-07-2024
Registration No
14/2024
Registration Date
02-07-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sau Rupali Santosh Mehenge
Adv. ROKADE DHANANJAY RATNAKAR
Pranjali Santosh Mehenge
Adv. ROKADE DHANANJAY RATNAKAR
Respondent(s)
Santosh Shriram Mehenge Advocate - CHATARKAR KAILAS DHONDBA
Shrimati Kasabai Shriram Mehenge
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 01-06-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 22-05-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 08-05-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 14/2024 Petitioners: Rupali Santosh Mehenge and Pranjali Santosh Mehenge Respondent: Santosh Shriram Mehenge (Advocate) Order: The petition for interim maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 23 was partially allowed. The respondent was ordered to pay ₹10,000 (ten thousand rupees only) as interim maintenance to the petitioner. Key Facts: The petitioner alleged domestic violence, harassment over dowry, beatings, and threats by the respondent and his family members. The petitioner and her minor daughter (Pranjali) are currently living separately at her maternal home. The respondent, employed in police service with monthly income of ₹80,000 and assets including property worth ₹50,00,000, contested all allegations. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and considered the respondent's financial capacity, necessitating interim financial support for the petitioner and child's maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 14/2024 Petitioners: Rupali Santosh Mehenge and Pranjali Santosh Mehenge Respondent: Santosh Shriram Mehenge (Advocate) Order: The petition for interim maintenance under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Section 23 was partially allowed. The respondent was ordered to pay ₹10,000 (ten thousand rupees only) as interim maintenance to the petitioner. Key Facts: The petitioner alleged domestic violence, harassment over dowry, beatings, and threats by the respondent and his family members. The petitioner and her minor daughter (Pranjali) are currently living separately at her maternal home. The respondent, employed in police service with monthly income of ₹80,000 and assets including property worth ₹50,00,000, contested all allegations. The court found prima facie evidence of domestic violence and considered the respondent's financial capacity, necessitating interim financial support for the petitioner and child's maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts