MEGHA SHUBHAM KAYANDE vs SHUBHAM DILIPRAO KAYANDE — 15/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,17,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHWS100007662025

Evidence

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

e-Filing Number

16-04-2025

Filing Number

654/2025

Filing Date

16-04-2025

Registration No

15/2025

Registration Date

16-04-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon

Judge

2-Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.MALEGAON

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,17,18,19,20,22,23

Petitioner(s)

MEGHA SHUBHAM KAYANDE

Adv. CHATARKAR KAILAS DHONDBA

Respondent(s)

SHUBHAM DILIPRAO KAYANDE

DILIPRAO RAMBHAU KAYANDE

ARUNA DILIPRAO KAYANDE

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.MALEGAON

02-06-2026

Evidence

15-05-2026

Evidence

15-04-2026

Evidence

25-03-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

07-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary of Case 15/2025 The Malegaon Court partially granted the interim maintenance petition filed by Megha Shubham Kayande under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court ordered respondent Shubham Diliprao Kayande to pay ₹3,000 per month as interim maintenance to the petitioner, who alleged domestic violence and claimed financial need. The respondents contested the claim, but the court found the petitioner's circumstances warranting protection and financial support pending the main case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 15/2025 The Malegaon Court partially granted the interim maintenance petition filed by Megha Shubham Kayande under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court ordered respondent Shubham Diliprao Kayande to pay ₹3,000 per month as interim maintenance to the petitioner, who alleged domestic violence and claimed financial need. The respondents contested the claim, but the court found the petitioner's circumstances warranting protection and financial support pending the main case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case