State of Maharashtra Through P S O PS Jaulka vs Sanghadip Manohar Gudade Advocate - SALUNKHE KISAN NAMDEO — 84/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS100007542023
Filing Number
653/2023
Filing Date
26-04-2023
Registration No
84/2023
Registration Date
26-04-2023
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
2-Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.MALEGAON
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0228
Police Station
JAULKA
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through P S O PS (Police Station) Jaulka
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sanghadip Manohar Gudade Advocate - SALUNKHE KISAN NAMDEO
Jaysen Pralhad Gudade
Ramesh Sopan Labade
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.MALEGAON
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted all three accused (Sanghadip Manohar Gudade, Jaysen Pralhad Gudade, and Ramesh Sopan Labade) of charges under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, 506, and 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of assault and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while prosecution witnesses testified about a violent incident on 3 October 2022 involving wooden sticks and threats, the complainant had settled the matter with the accused outside court, creating doubt about the veracity of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted all three accused (Sanghadip Manohar Gudade, Jaysen Pralhad Gudade, and Ramesh Sopan Labade) of charges under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, 506, and 34, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of assault and criminal intimidation beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while prosecution witnesses testified about a violent incident on 3 October 2022 involving wooden sticks and threats, the complainant had settled the matter with the accused outside court, creating doubt about the veracity of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts