Muktarkhan Sajavarkhan vs Subhani Bhika Gaurve Advocate - LAD JALINDHAR GOVINDRAO — 1100031/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Verification. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS100006752015
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
1100054/2015
Filing Date
18-06-2015
Registration No
1100031/2015
Registration Date
18-06-2015
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
2-Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.MALEGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muktarkhan Sajavarkhan
Adv. MAGAR SHANKARRAO SAKHARAMJI
Respondent(s)
Subhani Bhika Gaurve Advocate - LAD JALINDHAR GOVINDRAO
Gummnbi Subhani Gorave
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.MALEGAON
Verification
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Verification |
| 22-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 13-04-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 31/2015 – Mukhtyarkhan v. Subhani The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of agricultural property in Medshi, Washim district. The plaintiff, who purchased the property via registered sale-deed in 2002, had his ownership upheld in a prior dismissed suit (RCS No. 39/2007) and its unsuccessful appeal. Finding a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and risk of irreparable loss in the plaintiff's favor, the court enjoined the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's possession until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 31/2015 – Mukhtyarkhan v. Subhani The court granted a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of agricultural property in Medshi, Washim district. The plaintiff, who purchased the property via registered sale-deed in 2002, had his ownership upheld in a prior dismissed suit (RCS No. 39/2007) and its unsuccessful appeal. Finding a prima facie case, balance of convenience, and risk of irreparable loss in the plaintiff's favor, the court enjoined the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's possession until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts