State of Maharashtra Through P S O PS Shirpur vs Aniket Gulab Khillare Advocate - MAGAR SHANKARRAO SAKHARAMJI — 68/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS100005672023
Filing Number
485/2023
Filing Date
31-Mar-2023
Registration No
68/2023
Registration Date
31-Mar-2023
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0272
Police Station
SHIRPUR
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra Through P S O PS (Police Station) Shirpur
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Aniket Gulab Khillare Advocate - MAGAR SHANKARRAO SAKHARAMJI
-
2.Rushikesh Manohar Khillare
-
3.Ashwinkumar Manohar Khillare
-
4.Raju Ananda Khillare
-
5.Vijaynanda Gulab Khillare
-
6.Laxmi Manohar Khillare
-
7.Ankita Pramod Pophale
-
8.Sangita Raju Khillare
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary Case 68/2023 - State of Maharashtra v. Aniket Gulab Khillare & Others Court: First Class Magistrate Court, Malegaon | Judgment Date: June 11, 2026 Decision: All eight accused persons were acquitted of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 143, 147, 323, 504, 506 read with 149 (unlawful assembly, rioting, voluntarily causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and related offenses). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution's two witnesses (the complainant and injured witness) failed to provide credible evidence supporting the charges. Both witnesses lacked clear knowledge of incident details, contradicted the FIR, and gave responses that undermined the prosecution's case. Despite medical certificates confirming injuries, no corroborating evidence established that the accused committed the alleged September 20, 2022 assault in Karanji village. The court concluded insufficient evidence proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
26-May-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
30-Sep-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
03-Jul-2025
Charge
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
06-May-2025
Charge
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
08-Apr-2025
Charge
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
27-Feb-2025
Charge
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
13-Jan-2025
Charge
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
26-Nov-2024
Charge
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
15-Oct-2024
Charge
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
26-Aug-2024
Charge
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
16-Jul-2024
Charge
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
18-Jun-2024
Charge
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
22-Mar-2024
Charge
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
28-Dec-2023
Charge
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
25-Oct-2023
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
10-Aug-2023
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
07-Jun-2023
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
31-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 68/2023
Case Summary Case 68/2023 - State of Maharashtra v. Aniket Gulab Khillare & Others Court: First Class Magistrate Court, Malegaon | Judgment Date: June 11, 2026 Decision: All eight accused persons were acquitted of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 143, 147, 323, 504, 506 read with 149 (unlawful assembly, rioting, voluntarily causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and related offenses). Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution's two witnesses (the complainant and injured witness) failed to provide credible evidence supporting the charges. Both witnesses lacked clear knowledge of incident details, contradicted the FIR, and gave responses that undermined the prosecution's case. Despite medical certificates confirming injuries, no corroborating evidence established that the accused committed the alleged September 20, 2022 assault in Karanji village. The court concluded insufficient evidence proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts