DIPALI MAHESH DHONGADE vs MAHESH ARJUN DHONGADE Advocate - NAWGHARE SUBHASH SHAMRAO — 9/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,17,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHWS100005382025
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2025
Filing Number
459/2025
Filing Date
13-03-2025
Registration No
9/2025
Registration Date
13-03-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
2-Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.MALEGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIPALI MAHESH DHONGADE
Adv. GAWAI RAHUL DAMODHAR
Respondent(s)
MAHESH ARJUN DHONGADE Advocate - NAWGHARE SUBHASH SHAMRAO
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.MALEGAON
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 13-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: PWDVA No. 9/2025 The court rejected the respondent's application (Exh. 17) seeking permission to lead oral evidence in the interim maintenance proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court held that at the interim relief stage, decisions must be based on prima-facie satisfaction, pleadings, and documentary evidence—not oral testimony. The matter will proceed for arguments on interim maintenance, with both parties permitted to submit relevant documentary material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: PWDVA No. 9/2025 The court rejected the respondent's application (Exh. 17) seeking permission to lead oral evidence in the interim maintenance proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court held that at the interim relief stage, decisions must be based on prima-facie satisfaction, pleadings, and documentary evidence—not oral testimony. The matter will proceed for arguments on interim maintenance, with both parties permitted to submit relevant documentary material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts