Sau Vaishali Shankar Deshmukh vs Kiran Ramdayalu Chavhan Advocate - जोशी राम सत्यनारायण — 15/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS100004932026
Next Hearing
08th July 2026
e-Filing Number
16-03-2026
Filing Number
68/2026
Filing Date
16-03-2026
Registration No
15/2026
Registration Date
16-03-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sau Vaishali Shankar Deshmukh
Adv. POPHALE SANTOSH DATTATRAY
Respondent(s)
Kiran Ramdayalu Chavhan Advocate - जोशी राम सत्यनारायण
Nitesh Kashiram Chavhan
Adv. जोशी राम सत्यनारायण
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON
Issues
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Issues |
| 07-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 02-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 21-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 15-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. 15/2026 - Vaishali v. Kiran & Ors. Outcome: Temporary injunction application rejected. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss required for such relief. Key Issue: Boundary dispute over agricultural land (Gat No. 48) in Pangari Dhankuki, Malegaon, Washim. Petitioner claimed ownership through a June 2025 sale-deed but discrepancies existed between boundaries stated in her plaint versus her sale-deed, and respondents contested the property identification. Judgment: Court held petitioner did not prove actual possession and could not demonstrate non-applicants obstructed her rights, noting the fundamental boundary dispute precluded granting temporary injunction pending suit disposal. Each party bears own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. 15/2026 - Vaishali v. Kiran & Ors. Outcome: Temporary injunction application rejected. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss required for such relief. Key Issue: Boundary dispute over agricultural land (Gat No. 48) in Pangari Dhankuki, Malegaon, Washim. Petitioner claimed ownership through a June 2025 sale-deed but discrepancies existed between boundaries stated in her plaint versus her sale-deed, and respondents contested the property identification. Judgment: Court held petitioner did not prove actual possession and could not demonstrate non-applicants obstructed her rights, noting the fundamental boundary dispute precluded granting temporary injunction pending suit disposal. Each party bears own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts