Sau Vaishali Shankar Deshmukh vs Kiran Ramdayalu Chavhan Advocate - जोशी राम सत्यनारायण — 15/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS100004932026

Issues

Next Hearing

08th July 2026

e-Filing Number

16-03-2026

Filing Number

68/2026

Filing Date

16-03-2026

Registration No

15/2026

Registration Date

16-03-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 9

Petitioner(s)

Sau Vaishali Shankar Deshmukh

Adv. POPHALE SANTOSH DATTATRAY

Respondent(s)

Kiran Ramdayalu Chavhan Advocate - जोशी राम सत्यनारायण

Nitesh Kashiram Chavhan

Adv. जोशी राम सत्यनारायण

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON

10-06-2026

Issues

07-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

02-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

21-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

15-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

10-06-2026
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: R.C.S. 15/2026 - Vaishali v. Kiran & Ors. Outcome: Temporary injunction application rejected. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss required for such relief. Key Issue: Boundary dispute over agricultural land (Gat No. 48) in Pangari Dhankuki, Malegaon, Washim. Petitioner claimed ownership through a June 2025 sale-deed but discrepancies existed between boundaries stated in her plaint versus her sale-deed, and respondents contested the property identification. Judgment: Court held petitioner did not prove actual possession and could not demonstrate non-applicants obstructed her rights, noting the fundamental boundary dispute precluded granting temporary injunction pending suit disposal. Each party bears own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. 15/2026 - Vaishali v. Kiran & Ors. Outcome: Temporary injunction application rejected. The court found the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss required for such relief. Key Issue: Boundary dispute over agricultural land (Gat No. 48) in Pangari Dhankuki, Malegaon, Washim. Petitioner claimed ownership through a June 2025 sale-deed but discrepancies existed between boundaries stated in her plaint versus her sale-deed, and respondents contested the property identification. Judgment: Court held petitioner did not prove actual possession and could not demonstrate non-applicants obstructed her rights, noting the fundamental boundary dispute precluded granting temporary injunction pending suit disposal. Each party bears own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case