Sushma Prabhusingh Gaharwal vs Rajendrasingh Rajpalsingh Thakur Advocate - Roakde Dhananjay Ratnakar — 19/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS100003792019
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
34/2019
Filing Date
27-02-2019
Registration No
19/2019
Registration Date
27-02-2019
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sushma Prabhusingh Gaharwal
Adv. JOSHI RAM SATYANARAYAN
Meena Jitendersingh Pardesi
Respondent(s)
Rajendrasingh Rajpalsingh Thakur Advocate - Roakde Dhananjay Ratnakar
Santoshi Prakashhsingh Kachahvah
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 19/2019 Sushma Gharwal v. Rajendrasingh Thakur & Others The court granted a temporary injunction application on 30 June 2022, restraining Defendant No.1 from alienating or creating third-party interests in disputed agricultural land (gat No.16, Bhera) and house property at Malegaon. The dispute arose following their father's death in January 2019, with plaintiffs alleging he executed a fraudulent will favoring Defendant No.1, while claiming equal coparcenary rights in the joint Hindu family property. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience favoring plaintiffs, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction, noting that relying solely on Transfer of Property Act Section 52 would create cumbersome procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 19/2019 Sushma Gharwal v. Rajendrasingh Thakur & Others The court granted a temporary injunction application on 30 June 2022, restraining Defendant No.1 from alienating or creating third-party interests in disputed agricultural land (gat No.16, Bhera) and house property at Malegaon. The dispute arose following their father's death in January 2019, with plaintiffs alleging he executed a fraudulent will favoring Defendant No.1, while claiming equal coparcenary rights in the joint Hindu family property. The court found a prima facie case, balance of convenience favoring plaintiffs, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction, noting that relying solely on Transfer of Property Act Section 52 would create cumbersome procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts