State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Malegaon vs Dattaprabhu Sahebrao Ghuge Advocate - CHATARKAR KAILAS DHONDBA — 53/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,324,323,294,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 07th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS100003602022
Filing Number
278/2022
Filing Date
22-02-2022
Registration No
53/2022
Registration Date
22-02-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
409
Police Station
MALEGAON
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through Police Station Malegaon
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Dattaprabhu Sahebrao Ghuge Advocate - CHATARKAR KAILAS DHONDBA
Ganesh Sahebrao Ghuge
Adv. रोकडे धनंजय रत्नाकर
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. MALEGAON
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 53/2022 Court Decision: Both accused, Dattaprabhu Sahebrao Ghuge and Ganesh Sahebrao Ghuge, were acquitted of all charges on May 7, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The three prosecution witnesses (the complainant and two others) provided testimony lacking credibility and specifics about the alleged incident. The complainant could not recall when, where, or what actually occurred. Crucially, none of the witnesses meaningfully corroborated the prosecution's case, and no tangible evidence definitively proved the accused committed the alleged offenses under IPC Sections 452, 323, 324, 294, and 506 with common intention. The court concluded the prosecution's evidence was insufficient to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 53/2022 Court Decision: Both accused, Dattaprabhu Sahebrao Ghuge and Ganesh Sahebrao Ghuge, were acquitted of all charges on May 7, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The three prosecution witnesses (the complainant and two others) provided testimony lacking credibility and specifics about the alleged incident. The complainant could not recall when, where, or what actually occurred. Crucially, none of the witnesses meaningfully corroborated the prosecution's case, and no tangible evidence definitively proved the accused committed the alleged offenses under IPC Sections 452, 323, 324, 294, and 506 with common intention. The court concluded the prosecution's evidence was insufficient to sustain conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts