DIPALI VITTHAL SAWANT vs VITTHAL ZANAKRAO SAWANT — 1/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Depositing Amount. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
PWDVA Execution - Execution of order passed under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHWS100002112025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
20-01-2025
Filing Number
180/2025
Filing Date
23-01-2025
Registration No
1/2025
Registration Date
23-01-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
2-Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.MALEGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DIPALI VITTHAL SAWANT
Adv. ROKADE DHANANJAY RATNAKAR
DEVANSH VITTHAL SAWANT
Adv. ROKADE DHANANJAY RATNAKAR
Respondent(s)
VITTHAL ZANAKRAO SAWANT
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.MALEGAON
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
Depositing Amount
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-05-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 02-05-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 10-04-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 16-03-2026 | Depositing Amount |
| 17-02-2026 | Depositing Amount |
Interim Orders
Case 1/2025 Summary: The Malegaon JMFC court issued an arrest warrant against respondent Vitthal Zanakrao Sawant for Rs. 1,00,000 in unpaid maintenance amount. The petitioners (Dipali and Devansh Vitthal Sawant) sought the warrant after the respondent deliberately avoided depositing the ordered maintenance amount in court and failed to comply with prior maintenance orders issued in 2022. The court found the respondent had made no effort to settle the dues and ordered the warrant accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 1/2025 Summary: The Malegaon JMFC court issued an arrest warrant against respondent Vitthal Zanakrao Sawant for Rs. 1,00,000 in unpaid maintenance amount. The petitioners (Dipali and Devansh Vitthal Sawant) sought the warrant after the respondent deliberately avoided depositing the ordered maintenance amount in court and failed to comply with prior maintenance orders issued in 2022. The court found the respondent had made no effort to settle the dues and ordered the warrant accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts