State of Mah.Malegaon vs Bawireddy Pattabi Vyankateshwara — 1100591/2000
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279337304A. Disposed: Uncontested--DISCHARGED on 15th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS100001222000
Filing Number
1100591/2000
Filing Date
26-Dec-2000
Registration No
1100591/2000
Registration Date
26-Dec-2000
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
1-CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISCHARGED
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Mah.Malegaon
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bawireddy Pattabi Vyankateshwara
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Bawireddy Pattabi Vyankateshwara (1100591/2000) The court discharged the accused after finding insufficient evidence to prove the criminal charges under IPC sections 279, 337, and 304-A. The two key prosecution witnesses (Ballu/Suhas Pimpilkar and Pramila Pimpilkar) testified they had no knowledge of the alleged incident's details, timing, or location, and their testimonies contained no statements against the accused. Additionally, the crucial complainant's testimony was never recorded, and the standing warrant against the accused was recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
06-Apr-2026
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
27-Mar-2026
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
16-Mar-2026
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
06-Mar-2026
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
24-Feb-2026
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
13-Feb-2026
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
06-Feb-2026
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
27-Jan-2026
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
16-Jan-2026
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
05-Jan-2026
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
24-Dec-2025
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
04-Dec-2025
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
16-Oct-2025
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
05-Aug-2025
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
07-May-2025
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
06-Feb-2025
Dormant File ( Dormant Case )
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
31-Jan-2025
Restored
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
31-Jan-2025
Dormant File
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
10-Sep-2012
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
10-Sep-2012
Disposed
-
20-Apr-2012
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
01-Mar-2012
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
04-Nov-2011
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Malegaon
-
13-May-2011
Awaiting Summons
-
29-Jan-2011
N.B.W._Unready
-
30-Sep-2010
N.B.W._Unready
-
28-May-2010
N.B.W._Unready
-
09-Feb-2010
N.B.W._Unready
-
03-Oct-2009
N.B.W._Unready
-
23-Jun-2009
N.B.W._Unready
-
24-Mar-2009
N.B.W._Unready
-
03-Nov-2008
N.B.W._Unready
-
31-Oct-2008
N.B.W._Unready
-
05-Jun-2008
N.B.W._Unready
-
04-Mar-2008
N.B.W._Unready
-
20-Dec-2007
N.B.W._Unready
-
12-Sep-2007
N.B.W._Unready
-
10-Jul-2007
N.B.W._Unready
-
06-Mar-2007
N.B.W._Unready
-
08-Jan-2007
N.B.W._Unready
-
23-Nov-2006
N.B.W._Unready
-
20-Sep-2006
N.B.W._Unready
-
13-Jun-2006
N.B.W._Unready
-
06-Apr-2006
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Dec-2000
Case filed
Registration No. 1100591/2000
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Bawireddy Pattabi Vyankateshwara (1100591/2000) The court discharged the accused after finding insufficient evidence to prove the criminal charges under IPC sections 279, 337, and 304-A. The two key prosecution witnesses (Ballu/Suhas Pimpilkar and Pramila Pimpilkar) testified they had no knowledge of the alleged incident's details, timing, or location, and their testimonies contained no statements against the accused. Additionally, the crucial complainant's testimony was never recorded, and the standing warrant against the accused was recalled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts