Mahesh Gajanan Ingole vs Shaikh Imran Shaikh Khaja Advocate - JOSHI RAM SATYANARAYAN — 3/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS100000652024
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
03-01-2024
Filing Number
12/2024
Filing Date
06-01-2024
Registration No
3/2024
Registration Date
08-01-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division, Malegaon
Judge
2-Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.MALEGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahesh Gajanan Ingole
Adv. Ravindra Shamrao Gawali
Respondent(s)
Shaikh Imran Shaikh Khaja Advocate - JOSHI RAM SATYANARAYAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C.MALEGAON
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 27-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 13-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 07-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Mahesh Gajanan Ingole v. Shaikh Imran Shaikh Khaja (RCS 3/2024) Outcome: Temporary injunction granted in favor of plaintiff; defendant's counter-claim injunction rejected. Court found plaintiff has prima facie case with lawful possession of 22R land (Gat No. 376, Malegaon) inherited after father's 2023 death. Defendant's claims of adverse possession and Section 53-A protection under Transfer of Property Act were rejected as unsubstantiated. Balance of convenience favors plaintiff; defendant restrained from obstruction until suit disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Mahesh Gajanan Ingole v. Shaikh Imran Shaikh Khaja (RCS 3/2024) Outcome: Temporary injunction granted in favor of plaintiff; defendant's counter-claim injunction rejected. Court found plaintiff has prima facie case with lawful possession of 22R land (Gat No. 376, Malegaon) inherited after father's 2023 death. Defendant's claims of adverse possession and Section 53-A protection under Transfer of Property Act were rejected as unsubstantiated. Balance of convenience favors plaintiff; defendant restrained from obstruction until suit disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts