State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora vs Gajanan Baban Dhoke and 1 Advocate - RATHOD GHANSHAM RAMESH — 172/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 452,354,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS090013412021
Filing Number
1219/2021
Filing Date
16-11-2021
Registration No
172/2021
Registration Date
16-11-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
0532
Police Station
P. S. Manora
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora
Respondent(s)
Gajanan Baban Dhoke and 1 Advocate - RATHOD GHANSHAM RAMESH
Baban Tukaram Dhoke
Adv. APP
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 01-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 05-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: The court acquitted both accused (Gajanan Baban Dhoke and Baban Tukaram Dhoke) of charges under IPC Sections 452, 354, 323, 506 read with Section 34. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed house trespass, criminal intimidation, or voluntarily caused hurt to the complainant on July 25, 2021. The court found the testimonies of the two key witnesses (complainant and her husband) internally inconsistent and lacking corroboration, particularly regarding the alleged criminal intimidation and assault, making them insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The court acquitted both accused (Gajanan Baban Dhoke and Baban Tukaram Dhoke) of charges under IPC Sections 452, 354, 323, 506 read with Section 34. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed house trespass, criminal intimidation, or voluntarily caused hurt to the complainant on July 25, 2021. The court found the testimonies of the two key witnesses (complainant and her husband) internally inconsistent and lacking corroboration, particularly regarding the alleged criminal intimidation and assault, making them insufficient to establish guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts