State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora vs Nitin Shridhar Rathod - 2 Advocate - D. A. Chavhan — 183/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHWS090013362020

Filing Number

1232/2020

Filing Date

10-Dec-2020

Registration No

183/2020

Registration Date

10-Dec-2020

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Manora

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

Decision Date

16-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 25-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

498

Police Station

P. S. Manora

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,504,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nitin Shridhar Rathod - 2 Advocate - D. A. Chavhan

  2. 2.Shridhar Tulshiram Rathod

  3. 3.Sau. Kantabai Shridhar Rathod

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 183/2020 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused persons (Nitin Shridhar Rathod, Shridhar Tulshiram Rathod, Kantabai Shridhar Rathod, and Shridhar Tulshiram Rathod) of charges under IPC Sections 324, 323, and 504, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of assault and criminal intimidation. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case due to weak and contradictory witness testimonies. The complainant's own statements were inconsistent, the eyewitness account was unreliable, and critical evidence from scene inspection witnesses was lacking. Without sufficient corroborating evidence, the court concluded the prosecution could not prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had assaulted the complainant or used criminal intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  4. 08-May-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  6. 13-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  7. 20-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  9. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  10. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  11. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  12. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  13. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  14. 19-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  15. 11-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  16. 09-May-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  17. 19-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  18. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  19. 19-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  20. 03-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  21. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  22. 28-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  23. 17-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  24. 21-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  25. 16-Aug-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  26. 05-Aug-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  27. 29-Jul-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  28. 16-Jul-2024

    N.B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  29. 26-Jun-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  30. 30-May-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  31. 02-May-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  32. 18-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  33. 07-Feb-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  34. 20-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  35. 23-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  36. 06-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  37. 27-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  38. 26-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  39. 08-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  40. 09-Dec-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  41. 19-Oct-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  42. 20-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  43. 21-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  44. 25-Apr-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  45. 09-Mar-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  46. 08-Feb-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  47. 07-Feb-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  48. 06-Jan-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  49. 25-Nov-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  50. 21-Oct-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  51. 01-Oct-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  52. 11-Aug-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  53. 08-Jul-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  54. 11-May-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  55. 12-Mar-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  56. 18-Jan-2021

    Summons_Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora

  57. 14-Dec-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  58. 10-Dec-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 183/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 183/2020 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused persons (Nitin Shridhar Rathod, Shridhar Tulshiram Rathod, Kantabai Shridhar Rathod, and Shridhar Tulshiram Rathod) of charges under IPC Sections 324, 323, and 504, finding insufficient evidence to prove the allegations of assault and criminal intimidation. Key Reasoning: The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case due to weak and contradictory witness testimonies. The complainant's own statements were inconsistent, the eyewitness account was unreliable, and critical evidence from scene inspection witnesses was lacking. Without sufficient corroborating evidence, the court concluded the prosecution could not prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had assaulted the complainant or used criminal intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case