Mukund Haribhau Jaysingpure vs Manager - The Akola Jilha Madhyawarit bank- Dnyaneshwar Atamaram Chavhan — 139/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,465,500,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th June 2026.
Other Misc.Cri.Appln - Other Misc.Criminal Application
CNR: MHWS090013112022
Filing Number
1158/2022
Filing Date
17-11-2022
Registration No
139/2022
Registration Date
17-11-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora
Decision Date
09th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mukund Haribhau Jaysingpure
Adv. PAKHALE SAMADHAN NARAYAN
Respondent(s)
Manager - The Akola Jilha Madhyawarit bank- Dnyaneshwar Atamaram Chavhan
President, Korpe
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora
Disposed
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 10-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 24-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 16-03-2026 | Order on Exh |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 139/2022 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the criminal complaint filed by Mukund Haribhau Jaysingpure against the bank manager and chairman of Akola District Central Co-operative Bank for allegedly deceiving him through false documents and unauthorized cheque deposits. The court held that since the accused were public servants acting in their official capacity, prosecution required prior sanction which the complainant failed to obtain, and found insufficient grounds to proceed against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 139/2022 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the criminal complaint filed by Mukund Haribhau Jaysingpure against the bank manager and chairman of Akola District Central Co-operative Bank for allegedly deceiving him through false documents and unauthorized cheque deposits. The court held that since the accused were public servants acting in their official capacity, prosecution required prior sanction which the complainant failed to obtain, and found insufficient grounds to proceed against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts