State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora vs Balu Uttam Rathod — 143/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294,427,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS090011752021
Filing Number
1060/2021
Filing Date
08-10-2021
Registration No
143/2021
Registration Date
08-10-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
337
Police Station
P. S. Manora
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Balu Uttam Rathod
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Balu Uttam Rathod (Case 143/2021) Court Decision: The accused, Balu Uttam Rathod, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 294 (obscene language), 427 (mischief causing damage), 504 (insult with intent to provoke), and 506 (criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential elements of the offences beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the sole eyewitness (scene panchnama witness) provided unreliable testimony and refused to cooperate with the investigation. Despite repeated summons, the prosecution failed to present the complainant, investigating officer, and other material witnesses. Without corroborating evidence from these key witnesses, the court held that the allegations—that the accused used obscene language, damaged the complainant's vehicle causing ₹50,000 loss, and made death threats on 25 May 2021—could not be substantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Balu Uttam Rathod (Case 143/2021) Court Decision: The accused, Balu Uttam Rathod, was acquitted of all charges under IPC Sections 294 (obscene language), 427 (mischief causing damage), 504 (insult with intent to provoke), and 506 (criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential elements of the offences beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the sole eyewitness (scene panchnama witness) provided unreliable testimony and refused to cooperate with the investigation. Despite repeated summons, the prosecution failed to present the complainant, investigating officer, and other material witnesses. Without corroborating evidence from these key witnesses, the court held that the allegations—that the accused used obscene language, damaged the complainant's vehicle causing ₹50,000 loss, and made death threats on 25 May 2021—could not be substantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts