State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora vs Shiva Santosh Jadhav — 701/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 07th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS090011402025
Filing Number
1002/2025
Filing Date
15-10-2025
Registration No
701/2025
Registration Date
15-10-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
597
Police Station
P. S. Manora
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora
Respondent(s)
Shiva Santosh Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 08-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 21-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Shiva Santosh Jadhav (SSC 701/2025) The court dismissed proceedings against accused Shiva Santosh Jadhav under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found the prosecution had repeatedly failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons, and critically, had not filed the required Chemical Analysis report for the alleged liquor—rendering continuation futile. Bail bonds were cancelled, sureties discharged, and seized liquor directed to the State Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Shiva Santosh Jadhav (SSC 701/2025) The court dismissed proceedings against accused Shiva Santosh Jadhav under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita for an alleged offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found the prosecution had repeatedly failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons, and critically, had not filed the required Chemical Analysis report for the alleged liquor—rendering continuation futile. Bail bonds were cancelled, sureties discharged, and seized liquor directed to the State Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts