The State of Maharashtra Through P.S. Asegaon vs Gajanan Pralhadrao Wankhede and 2 Advocate - RATHOD PAWAN DAYARAM — 129/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS090010382021
Filing Number
939/2021
Filing Date
27-08-2021
Registration No
129/2021
Registration Date
27-08-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
10
Police Station
P.S. Asegaon
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Through P.S. Asegaon
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Gajanan Pralhadrao Wankhede and 2 Advocate - RATHOD PAWAN DAYARAM
Tai Pralhad Wankhede
Pralhad Parasram Wankhede
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 23-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY The court acquitted all three defendants (Gajanan Pralhadrao Wankhede and two family members) of charges under IPC sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 323 (causing hurt), and 506 (criminal intimidation) with section 34 (common intention). The court found that while the complainant (wife) and supporting witnesses testified to allegations of dowry harassment, physical abuse, and threats to life, the prosecution failed to produce sufficient corroborating evidence—including medical records or independent witnesses—to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in acquittal on May 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY The court acquitted all three defendants (Gajanan Pralhadrao Wankhede and two family members) of charges under IPC sections 498-A (cruelty to wife), 323 (causing hurt), and 506 (criminal intimidation) with section 34 (common intention). The court found that while the complainant (wife) and supporting witnesses testified to allegations of dowry harassment, physical abuse, and threats to life, the prosecution failed to produce sufficient corroborating evidence—including medical records or independent witnesses—to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, resulting in acquittal on May 13, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts