State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora vs Jyoti Kailas Bhawale and — 102/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 05th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS090008202021
Filing Number
740/2021
Filing Date
20-07-2021
Registration No
102/2021
Registration Date
20-07-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
680
Police Station
P. S. Manora
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora
Adv. app
Respondent(s)
Jyoti Kailas Bhawale and
Parubai Dilip Patre
Shivaji Champat Patre
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 05-03-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 102/2021 - Summary Court Decision (dated 05/05/2026): The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Jyoti Kailas Bhawale, Parubai Dilip Patre, and Shivaji Champat Patre) of charges under IPC Sections 324, 504, 506 with Section 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged incident of 29/10/2020, wherein the accused allegedly assaulted the complainant and his wife with an iron rod and weapons, abused them, and threatened their lives. The witness testimonies, particularly from the injured witnesses, were inconsistent and lacked credibility, with the complainant admitting to an out-of-court settlement with the accused, rendering the prosecution's case insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 102/2021 - Summary Court Decision (dated 05/05/2026): The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted all three accused (Jyoti Kailas Bhawale, Parubai Dilip Patre, and Shivaji Champat Patre) of charges under IPC Sections 324, 504, 506 with Section 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the alleged incident of 29/10/2020, wherein the accused allegedly assaulted the complainant and his wife with an iron rod and weapons, abused them, and threatened their lives. The witness testimonies, particularly from the injured witnesses, were inconsistent and lacked credibility, with the complainant admitting to an out-of-court settlement with the accused, rendering the prosecution's case insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts