State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora vs Shyam Kalu Rathod — 477/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS090007542025
Filing Number
658/2025
Filing Date
03-07-2025
Registration No
477/2025
Registration Date
03-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
201
Police Station
P. S. Manora
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora
Respondent(s)
Shyam Kalu Rathod
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 16-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: Case 477/2025 - State of Maharashtra v. Shyam Kalu Rathod The court acquitted respondent Shyam Kalu Rathod of charges under Section 65(E) of the Mumbai Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to establish its case due to insufficient evidence: while the panchnama (seizure record) was acknowledged as valid, the police could not clearly demonstrate that the seized liquor bottles were recovered from the respondent's possession, and no independent witnesses or chemical analysis reports were produced to corroborate the allegations. Consequently, the court found the charges unproven and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Case 477/2025 - State of Maharashtra v. Shyam Kalu Rathod The court acquitted respondent Shyam Kalu Rathod of charges under Section 65(E) of the Mumbai Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to establish its case due to insufficient evidence: while the panchnama (seizure record) was acknowledged as valid, the police could not clearly demonstrate that the seized liquor bottles were recovered from the respondent's possession, and no independent witnesses or chemical analysis reports were produced to corroborate the allegations. Consequently, the court found the charges unproven and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts