Santosh Laxman Puri vs Raju Madhao Giri and — 33/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 109,118(1),296,333,352,351(2),3(5). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHWS090004842025
e-Filing Number
28-04-2025
Filing Number
417/2025
Filing Date
29-04-2025
Registration No
33/2025
Registration Date
29-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Santosh Laxman Puri
Adv. TAHSEEN AHMAD KHAN AHMADYAR KHAN
Respondent(s)
Raju Madhao Giri and
Pavan Raju Giri
Uttara Raju Giri
Amol Dadarao Gawande Urf Wankhade Patil
Police Station Officer
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | Order |
| 30-03-2026 | Order |
| 24-03-2026 | Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court directed Police Station Manora to register a criminal case against four accused (respondents Raju Madhao Giri, Pavan Raju Giri, Uttara Raju Giri, and their associate) under BNS sections 109, 118(1), 296, 333, 352, and 351(2). The petitioner alleged the accused orchestrated a fraudulent marriage, extracted ₹5,51,210 and jewelry from him, then assaulted him with weapons on 26/01/2025, causing knife injuries requiring eight stitches. The court found the petitioner's medical records, transaction receipts, and supporting documents prima-facie substantiated the allegations, despite the police station's initial resistance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court directed Police Station Manora to register a criminal case against four accused (respondents Raju Madhao Giri, Pavan Raju Giri, Uttara Raju Giri, and their associate) under BNS sections 109, 118(1), 296, 333, 352, and 351(2). The petitioner alleged the accused orchestrated a fraudulent marriage, extracted ₹5,51,210 and jewelry from him, then assaulted him with weapons on 26/01/2025, causing knife injuries requiring eight stitches. The court found the petitioner's medical records, transaction receipts, and supporting documents prima-facie substantiated the allegations, despite the police station's initial resistance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts