State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora vs Amar Bhanudas Kamble — 95/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294, 427, 506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHWS090004782022

Case disposed

Filing Number

426/2022

Filing Date

25-03-2022

Registration No

95/2022

Registration Date

25-03-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Manora

Judge

4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora

Decision Date

11th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

525

Police Station

P. S. Manora

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 294, 427, 506

Petitioner(s)

State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Amar Bhanudas Kamble

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora

11-05-2026

Disposed

20-04-2026

Arguments

27-03-2026

Arguments

16-03-2026

Arguments

09-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

11-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Amar Bhanudas Kamble (95/2022) The court acquitted the accused, Amar Bhanudas Kamble, of charges under IPC Sections 294 (obscene language), 427 (mischief), and 506 (criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential elements of the alleged offenses—that on 01/08/2021, the accused used obscene language, damaged the complainant's motorcycle causing ₹10,000 loss, and issued death threats. The sole prosecution witness (the complainant) did not substantiate these claims during examination and later admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused. Without credible corroborating evidence, the court held the charges unproven and declared the accused not guilty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Amar Bhanudas Kamble (95/2022) The court acquitted the accused, Amar Bhanudas Kamble, of charges under IPC Sections 294 (obscene language), 427 (mischief), and 506 (criminal intimidation). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential elements of the alleged offenses—that on 01/08/2021, the accused used obscene language, damaged the complainant's motorcycle causing ₹10,000 loss, and issued death threats. The sole prosecution witness (the complainant) did not substantiate these claims during examination and later admitted to an out-of-court settlement with the accused. Without credible corroborating evidence, the court held the charges unproven and declared the accused not guilty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division, Manora All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case