State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora vs Anil Ramesh Thorat Advocate - THAKARE RAMPRASAD DHANURDHAR — 93/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 394. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS090004762022
Filing Number
424/2022
Filing Date
25-03-2022
Registration No
93/2022
Registration Date
25-03-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
788
Police Station
P. S. Manora
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Anil Ramesh Thorat Advocate - THAKARE RAMPRASAD DHANURDHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Disposed
Arguments
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 93/2022 - State of Maharashtra v. Anil Ramesh Thorat The court acquitted the accused Anil Ramesh Thorat of charges under IPC Section 394 (dacoity). The prosecution alleged that on 28/11/2021, the accused attempted robbery, assaulted the complainant with a stick near Arunawati River, Manora, and stole Rs. 700 and a mobile phone. However, the court found the prosecution failed to establish the charge beyond reasonable doubt, as only one witness was examined and critical evidence—including the complainant's testimony, other eyewitness accounts, medical records, and investigation officer statements—was not presented, rendering the available evidence insufficient to prove guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 93/2022 - State of Maharashtra v. Anil Ramesh Thorat The court acquitted the accused Anil Ramesh Thorat of charges under IPC Section 394 (dacoity). The prosecution alleged that on 28/11/2021, the accused attempted robbery, assaulted the complainant with a stick near Arunawati River, Manora, and stole Rs. 700 and a mobile phone. However, the court found the prosecution failed to establish the charge beyond reasonable doubt, as only one witness was examined and critical evidence—including the complainant's testimony, other eyewitness accounts, medical records, and investigation officer statements—was not presented, rendering the available evidence insufficient to prove guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts