State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora vs Suraj urf Sk. Irfan Sk. Gani Sk. Noor and 5 Advocate - Ingole M.S. — 67/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS090004332022
Filing Number
387/2022
Filing Date
19-03-2022
Registration No
67/2022
Registration Date
19-03-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
748
Police Station
P. S. Manora
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Suraj urf Sk. Irfan Sk. Gani Sk. Noor and 5 Advocate - Ingole M.S.
Sk. Gani Sk. Noor
Sayarabee Sk. Gani
Sk. Sahil Sk. Gani
Gulshan urf Guddi Sk. Saddam
Muskan Saddam Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Disposed
Arguments
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Suraj aka Sk. Irfan (Case 67/2022) Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate Court in Manora acquitted all six accused under IPC sections 498(a), 323, 504, 506 read with section 34, and Dowry Prohibition Act section 4, finding insufficient evidence to establish the alleged dowry harassment, physical assault, and death threats against the complainant. Key Reasoning: The only witness (the complainant/wife) failed to substantiate her allegations during examination, contradicted herself on crucial points, later settled the matter out-of-court, and provided no consistent testimony regarding money demands, abuse, or threats. The prosecution produced insufficient evidence to prove the essential ingredients of the offences charged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Suraj aka Sk. Irfan (Case 67/2022) Court Decision: The First Class Magistrate Court in Manora acquitted all six accused under IPC sections 498(a), 323, 504, 506 read with section 34, and Dowry Prohibition Act section 4, finding insufficient evidence to establish the alleged dowry harassment, physical assault, and death threats against the complainant. Key Reasoning: The only witness (the complainant/wife) failed to substantiate her allegations during examination, contradicted herself on crucial points, later settled the matter out-of-court, and provided no consistent testimony regarding money demands, abuse, or threats. The prosecution produced insufficient evidence to prove the essential ingredients of the offences charged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts