State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora vs Nandkishor Devising Jadhav and 1 Advocate - KHAN TAHSEEN AHMAD — 43/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS090004222019
Filing Number
370/2019
Filing Date
14-06-2019
Registration No
43/2019
Registration Date
14-06-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Decision Date
02nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
436
Police Station
P. S. Manora
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Nandkishor Devising Jadhav and 1 Advocate - KHAN TAHSEEN AHMAD
Sau. Pramila Kishor Chavhan
Adv. KHAN TAHSEEN AHMAD
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Nandkishor Devising Jadhav (43/2019) Decision: The court acquitted both accused Nandkishor Devising Jadhav and Pramila Kishor Chavhan of charges under IPC sections 324, 504, 506 with section 34. The prosecution failed to substantiate the allegations of causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and criminal threats through inadequate witness testimony and insufficient evidence. Key Reasoning: The court found critical evidentiary gaps: the primary injured witness (complainant) refused to clarify the incident details, the eyewitness witness did not support the prosecution case, and key witnesses including medical and investigating officers were not produced. The court concluded the prosecution failed to prove the criminal elements of the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Nandkishor Devising Jadhav (43/2019) Decision: The court acquitted both accused Nandkishor Devising Jadhav and Pramila Kishor Chavhan of charges under IPC sections 324, 504, 506 with section 34. The prosecution failed to substantiate the allegations of causing hurt, criminal intimidation, and criminal threats through inadequate witness testimony and insufficient evidence. Key Reasoning: The court found critical evidentiary gaps: the primary injured witness (complainant) refused to clarify the incident details, the eyewitness witness did not support the prosecution case, and key witnesses including medical and investigating officers were not produced. The court concluded the prosecution failed to prove the criminal elements of the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts