State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora vs Madhukar Bhattu Rathod — 229/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS090003742025
Filing Number
326/2025
Filing Date
01-04-2025
Registration No
229/2025
Registration Date
01-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
168
Police Station
P. S. Manora
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora
Respondent(s)
Madhukar Bhattu Rathod
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 21-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 229/2025 The court acquitted defendant Madhukar Bhattu Rathod of charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for allegedly possessing 33 bottles of alcohol on 15/03/2025 in Manora. The prosecution's sole witness (a panchnama official) could not credibly establish that the seized liquor was recovered from the defendant's possession, as the court found contradictions in the evidence and absence of supporting documentation. Without sufficient corroborating evidence or chemical analysis reports, the court ruled the charges unproven and ordered the defendant's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 229/2025 The court acquitted defendant Madhukar Bhattu Rathod of charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for allegedly possessing 33 bottles of alcohol on 15/03/2025 in Manora. The prosecution's sole witness (a panchnama official) could not credibly establish that the seized liquor was recovered from the defendant's possession, as the court found contradictions in the evidence and absence of supporting documentation. Without sufficient corroborating evidence or chemical analysis reports, the court ruled the charges unproven and ordered the defendant's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts