State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora vs Tulshiram Ramji Rathod and 3 Advocate - RATHOD PAWAN DAYARAM — 47/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,324,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS090003432021
Filing Number
310/2021
Filing Date
19-03-2021
Registration No
47/2021
Registration Date
19-03-2021
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Decision Date
13th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
78
Police Station
P. S. Manora
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora
Adv. app
Respondent(s)
Tulshiram Ramji Rathod and 3 Advocate - RATHOD PAWAN DAYARAM
Meerabai Tulshiram Rathod
Adv. Chavhan D.A.
Sunita Indal Aade
Adv. Chavhan D.A.
Vandana Umesh Aade
Adv. Chavhan D.A.
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 20-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Tulshiram Ramji Rathod (47/2021) The court acquitted all four accused under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, and 506 (with section 34). The prosecution failed to prove the alleged assault and criminal intimidation incident of 18 February 2021, as critical evidence from the complainant, eyewitnesses, medical officer, and investigating officer was not presented in trial despite ample opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Tulshiram Ramji Rathod (47/2021) The court acquitted all four accused under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, and 506 (with section 34). The prosecution failed to prove the alleged assault and criminal intimidation incident of 18 February 2021, as critical evidence from the complainant, eyewitnesses, medical officer, and investigating officer was not presented in trial despite ample opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts