State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora vs Pawan Vasanta Murale Advocate - THAKARE RAMPRASAD DHANURDHAR — 5/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 29th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS090000732020
Filing Number
64/2020
Filing Date
27-01-2020
Registration No
5/2020
Registration Date
27-01-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora
Decision Date
29th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
503
Police Station
P. S. Manora
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Mahrashtra through Police Station, Manora
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Pawan Vasanta Murale Advocate - THAKARE RAMPRASAD DHANURDHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Manora
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 14-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 28-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Regular Criminal Case No. 5/2020 Court Decision: The accused, Pawan Vasanta Murale, was acquitted and found not guilty under IPC Sections 294 (obscene speech) and 506 (criminal intimidation) due to insufficient evidence presented by the prosecution. Key Reasoning: Despite testimonies from six witnesses, including the informant and eyewitnesses, the court found significant inconsistencies and contradictions in their accounts regarding the alleged abusive language and death threats. The court noted that crucial details provided in court testimonies were not mentioned in earlier police statements, casting doubt on witness credibility and the reliability of the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Regular Criminal Case No. 5/2020 Court Decision: The accused, Pawan Vasanta Murale, was acquitted and found not guilty under IPC Sections 294 (obscene speech) and 506 (criminal intimidation) due to insufficient evidence presented by the prosecution. Key Reasoning: Despite testimonies from six witnesses, including the informant and eyewitnesses, the court found significant inconsistencies and contradictions in their accounts regarding the alleged abusive language and death threats. The court noted that crucial details provided in court testimonies were not mentioned in earlier police statements, casting doubt on witness credibility and the reliability of the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts