Sau Sitabai Dhanraj Chavhan vs Dhruv Parashram Rathod and 3 Advocate - CHAUDHARI PRAVIN NANASAHEB — 4/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS090000582019
Next Hearing
04th August 2026
Filing Number
6/2019
Filing Date
11-01-2019
Registration No
4/2019
Registration Date
11-01-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Manora
Judge
4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sau Sitabai Dhanraj Chavhan
Adv. THAKARE RAMPRASAD DHANURDHAR
Respondent(s)
Dhruv Parashram Rathod and 3 Advocate - CHAUDHARI PRAVIN NANASAHEB
Shalik Parashram Rathod
Adv. CHAUDHARI PRAVIN NANASAHEB
Dayawanti Dhruv Rathod
Adv. CHAUDHARI PRAVIN NANASAHEB
Arif Ahmad Punjani
Adv. BANG PRASHANT RAMNIWAS
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Jt. Civil Judge, Jr. dn. and JMFC., Manora
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 20-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 11-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 14-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sitabai v. Dhruv Parashram Rathod (RCS 4/2019) Order Outcome (18 July 2023): The court rejected plaintiff Sitabai's application seeking a corrected Court Commissioner's report on property measurement. The court found no need for further corrected reports and held that commissioners cannot be appointed to collect evidence. Costs awarded in the main cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sitabai v. Dhruv Parashram Rathod (RCS 4/2019) Order Outcome (18 July 2023): The court rejected plaintiff Sitabai's application seeking a corrected Court Commissioner's report on property measurement. The court found no need for further corrected reports and held that commissioners cannot be appointed to collect evidence. Costs awarded in the main cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts