State through P.S.O.P.S. Risod vs Rajesh Bhagawan Rathod — 725/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS080015852020
Filing Number
1370/2020
Filing Date
21-12-2020
Registration No
725/2020
Registration Date
21-12-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
647
Police Station
P.S. Risod
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State through P.S.O.P.S. Risod
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rajesh Bhagawan Rathod
Badri Mohan Rathod
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 04-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 725/2020 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate in Risod acquitted both defendants, Rajesh Bhagawan Rathod and Badri Mohan Rathod, of charges under IPC sections 341, 504, 506 read with section 34 (criminal intimidation, criminal intimidation by words, and abetment). The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and plagued with contradictions, noting that key witnesses testified only to verbal arguments rather than substantiating the alleged threatening and intimidation incident at the school on August 25, 2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 725/2020 Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate in Risod acquitted both defendants, Rajesh Bhagawan Rathod and Badri Mohan Rathod, of charges under IPC sections 341, 504, 506 read with section 34 (criminal intimidation, criminal intimidation by words, and abetment). The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and plagued with contradictions, noting that key witnesses testified only to verbal arguments rather than substantiating the alleged threatening and intimidation incident at the school on August 25, 2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts