Anil Wamanrao Deshmukh vs Prakashrao Bajirao Sarnaik Advocate - Awatade Gajanan Prakash — 81/2022

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS080011372022

Filing Number

161/2022

Filing Date

16-Jul-2022

Registration No

81/2022

Registration Date

16-Jul-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Risod

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anil Wamanrao Deshmukh

    Adv. Sarnik Mahesh Digambarrao

  2. 2.Chhayabai Anil Deshmukh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prakashrao Bajirao Sarnaik Advocate - Awatade Gajanan Prakash

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  5. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  7. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  9. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  10. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  11. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  12. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  13. 19-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  14. 13-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  15. 10-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  16. 06-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  17. 07-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  18. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  19. 09-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  20. 21-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  21. 17-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  22. 19-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  23. 06-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  24. 20-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  25. 10-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  26. 03-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  27. 12-Feb-2024

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  28. 09-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  29. 29-Nov-2023

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  30. 25-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  31. 21-Sep-2023

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  32. 30-Aug-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 81/2022 Outcome: Petition GRANTED. The court issued a temporary (interim) injunction in favor of petitioners Anil Wamanrao Deshmukh and Chhayabai Anil Deshmukh against respondent Prakashrao Bajirao Sarnaik. Key Issue: Property boundary dispute concerning access to a government road adjacent to petitioners' western property boundary. The respondent allegedly attempted to install iron pipes/barriers on the government road, obstructing petitioners' right of way. Court Finding: Based on available evidence, petitioners established prima facie case for temporary relief. The court could not definitively establish respondent's exclusive right to the disputed area from submitted documents, and noted respondent failed to provide adequate evidence of ownership over the western boundary area. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  33. 30-Aug-2023

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  34. 22-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  35. 25-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  36. 15-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  37. 04-May-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  38. 18-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  39. 27-Mar-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  40. 27-Mar-2023

    Compliance

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  41. 20-Mar-2023

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  42. 04-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  43. 17-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  44. 03-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  45. 23-Jan-2023

    Order

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  46. 22-Dec-2022

    Order

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  47. 05-Dec-2022

    Order

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  48. 03-Nov-2022

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  49. 13-Oct-2022

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  50. 20-Sep-2022

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  51. 25-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  52. 01-Aug-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  53. 25-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.

  54. 16-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 16-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 81/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 81/2022 Outcome: Petition GRANTED. The court issued a temporary (interim) injunction in favor of petitioners Anil Wamanrao Deshmukh and Chhayabai Anil Deshmukh against respondent Prakashrao Bajirao Sarnaik. Key Issue: Property boundary dispute concerning access to a government road adjacent to petitioners' western property boundary. The respondent allegedly attempted to install iron pipes/barriers on the government road, obstructing petitioners' right of way. Court Finding: Based on available evidence, petitioners established prima facie case for temporary relief. The court could not definitively establish respondent's exclusive right to the disputed area from submitted documents, and noted respondent failed to provide adequate evidence of ownership over the western boundary area. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case