Anil Wamanrao Deshmukh vs Prakashrao Bajirao Sarnaik Advocate - Awatade Gajanan Prakash — 81/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS080011372022
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
161/2022
Filing Date
16-07-2022
Registration No
81/2022
Registration Date
16-07-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anil Wamanrao Deshmukh
Adv. Sarnik Mahesh Digambarrao
Chhayabai Anil Deshmukh
Respondent(s)
Prakashrao Bajirao Sarnaik Advocate - Awatade Gajanan Prakash
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 81/2022 Outcome: Petition GRANTED. The court issued a temporary (interim) injunction in favor of petitioners Anil Wamanrao Deshmukh and Chhayabai Anil Deshmukh against respondent Prakashrao Bajirao Sarnaik. Key Issue: Property boundary dispute concerning access to a government road adjacent to petitioners' western property boundary. The respondent allegedly attempted to install iron pipes/barriers on the government road, obstructing petitioners' right of way. Court Finding: Based on available evidence, petitioners established prima facie case for temporary relief. The court could not definitively establish respondent's exclusive right to the disputed area from submitted documents, and noted respondent failed to provide adequate evidence of ownership over the western boundary area. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 81/2022 Outcome: Petition GRANTED. The court issued a temporary (interim) injunction in favor of petitioners Anil Wamanrao Deshmukh and Chhayabai Anil Deshmukh against respondent Prakashrao Bajirao Sarnaik. Key Issue: Property boundary dispute concerning access to a government road adjacent to petitioners' western property boundary. The respondent allegedly attempted to install iron pipes/barriers on the government road, obstructing petitioners' right of way. Court Finding: Based on available evidence, petitioners established prima facie case for temporary relief. The court could not definitively establish respondent's exclusive right to the disputed area from submitted documents, and noted respondent failed to provide adequate evidence of ownership over the western boundary area. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts