Abdul Samad Shekh Rahim vs Shekh Roshan Shekh Kadir Advocate - TAVSHIFODDIN KAISARODDIN — 67/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS080008762022
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
129/2022
Filing Date
06-06-2022
Registration No
67/2022
Registration Date
06-06-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
7-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Abdul Samad Shekh Rahim
Adv. DESHMUKH PRASHANT SHRIPADRAO
Respondent(s)
Shekh Roshan Shekh Kadir Advocate - TAVSHIFODDIN KAISARODDIN
Rashid Shah Saidu Shah
Adv. TAVSHIFODDIN KAISARODDIN
Latabai Sakharam Gaikwad
Adv. MAHAJAN DATTA VAIJNATH
Najerkha Ahemadkha
Adv. TAVSHIFODDIN KAISARODDIN
Kanhaiyya Sudhir Yengad
Gajendra Kashinath Khandalekar
Adv. MAHAJAN DATTA VAIJNATH
Hearing History
Judge: 7-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | W.S. and Say |
| 16-03-2026 | W.S. and Say |
| 27-01-2026 | W.S. and Say |
| 20-12-2025 | W.S. and Say |
| 15-12-2025 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Case 67/2022 Summary Court: 2nd Joint Civil Court, Risod (Maharashtra) Date: 08.01.2024 The court allowed the petitioner Abdul Samad Shekh Rahim's application for amended pleadings under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code. The petitioner sought permission to correct defendant no. 5's name from "Kunhaya Sudhir Angad" to "Sudhir Kunhaya Angad" in the plaint. The court found the proposed amendment material for proper case resolution and granted it, ordering the petitioner to file the amended plaint by the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 67/2022 Summary Court: 2nd Joint Civil Court, Risod (Maharashtra) Date: 08.01.2024 The court allowed the petitioner Abdul Samad Shekh Rahim's application for amended pleadings under Order 6, Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code. The petitioner sought permission to correct defendant no. 5's name from "Kunhaya Sudhir Angad" to "Sudhir Kunhaya Angad" in the plaint. The court found the proposed amendment material for proper case resolution and granted it, ordering the petitioner to file the amended plaint by the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts