Saraswati Vishwanath Late vs Sanjay Lodji Pandit Advocate - UNDAL TUSHAR MADANRAO — 56/2020
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS080007922020
Next Hearing
23rd July 2026
Filing Number
108/2020
Filing Date
21-07-2020
Registration No
56/2020
Registration Date
21-07-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Saraswati Vishwanath Late
Adv. DESHMUKH PRASHANT SHRIPADRAO
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Lodji Pandit Advocate - UNDAL TUSHAR MADANRAO
Anil Sitaram Pandit
Gokul Lodji Pandit
Udhav Lodji Pandit
Manjit Bhagwan Dhole
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary of RCS No. 56/2020: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend Issue No. 1 in a permanent injunction suit. The original issue requiring proof of ownership and possession was amended to require proof only of lawful possession, aligning with the legal requirements for permanent injunction cases. The amended issue now reads: "Whether plaintiff is lawful possessor of the suit property described in para no.1 of the plaint." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of RCS No. 56/2020: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend Issue No. 1 in a permanent injunction suit. The original issue requiring proof of ownership and possession was amended to require proof only of lawful possession, aligning with the legal requirements for permanent injunction cases. The amended issue now reads: "Whether plaintiff is lawful possessor of the suit property described in para no.1 of the plaint." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts