Kalawati Wd/o Sampat Davhale vs Vatsala Wd/o Kashiram Khadse Advocate - IRATKAR SAGAR PUNDLIK — 69/2017

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHWS080007402017

Evidence

Next Hearing

03rd August 2026

Filing Number

119/2017

Filing Date

14-08-2017

Registration No

69/2017

Registration Date

14-08-2017

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Risod

Judge

7-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 22

Petitioner(s)

Kalawati Wd/o Sampat Davhale

Adv. DESHMUKH PRASHANT SHRIPADRAO

Leelawati Wd/o Madhukar Palaskar

Kanta W/o Prabhakar Bhise

Respondent(s)

Vatsala Wd/o Kashiram Khadse Advocate - IRATKAR SAGAR PUNDLIK

Rama Kashiram Khadse

Shankar @ Madhav Kashiram Khadse

Varsha Prabhakar Shinde

Bali W/o Sandip Parhad

Shobha Wd/o Nivrutti Khadse

Gajanan Nivrutti Khadse

Mangala Tukaram More

Anita Jagan Davhale

Savita Shivaji Pacharane

Hearing History

Judge: 7-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod

10-06-2026

Evidence

15-04-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

20-02-2026

Evidence

04-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

20-01-2023
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: R.C.C. 69/2017 - Kalavati vs. Vatsala In this partition and separate possession suit, the court allowed defendants 06-10's application to set aside a "no cross" order dated 09/01/2023. The court permitted the defendants to cross-examine the plaintiff upon payment of Rs. 200 as costs, with the requirement to deposit the amount by the next date or the order would be automatically cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.C. 69/2017 - Kalavati vs. Vatsala In this partition and separate possession suit, the court allowed defendants 06-10's application to set aside a "no cross" order dated 09/01/2023. The court permitted the defendants to cross-examine the plaintiff upon payment of Rs. 200 as costs, with the requirement to deposit the amount by the next date or the order would be automatically cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division,Risod All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case