Ratna Santosh Yeole vs Tukaram Waman Yeole Advocate - UNDAL MADANRAO KUNDLIKRAO — 60/2019
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 22,34. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS080007302019
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
133/2019
Filing Date
10-07-2019
Registration No
60/2019
Registration Date
10-07-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ratna Santosh Yeole
Adv. MAHAJAN DATTA VAIJNATH
Pallawi Santosh Yeole
Aarti Santosh Yeole
Komal Santosh Yeole
Respondent(s)
Tukaram Waman Yeole Advocate - UNDAL MADANRAO KUNDLIKRAO
Sakharam Tukaram Yeole
Sitaram Tukaram Yeole
Ambadas Tukaram Yeole
Santosh Tukaram Yeole
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Citation
Citation
Citation
Citation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 21-04-2026 | Citation |
| 07-04-2026 | Citation |
| 25-03-2026 | Citation |
| 16-03-2026 | Citation |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 60/2019 Court: Joint Civil Judge & JMFC, Risod, Maharashtra Date: 04.12.2023 The petition filed by Ratna Santosh Yeole and others challenging a written statement was partly allowed. The court granted the petitioners' application under CPC Order 6 Rule 17 to amend/correct defects in the written statement filed by the respondent, finding the pleadings deficient. The respondent was directed to file a corrected written statement within the prescribed period. The court imposed costs of Rs. 500 on the respondent, payable to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 60/2019 Court: Joint Civil Judge & JMFC, Risod, Maharashtra Date: 04.12.2023 The petition filed by Ratna Santosh Yeole and others challenging a written statement was partly allowed. The court granted the petitioners' application under CPC Order 6 Rule 17 to amend/correct defects in the written statement filed by the respondent, finding the pleadings deficient. The respondent was directed to file a corrected written statement within the prescribed period. The court imposed costs of Rs. 500 on the respondent, payable to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts