State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Risod vs Vishal Ganesh Kharat — 68/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(a),323,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS080005232024
Filing Number
438/2024
Filing Date
02-04-2024
Registration No
68/2024
Registration Date
02-04-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
710
Police Station
P.S. Risod
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Risod
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vishal Ganesh Kharat
Ganesh Narayan Kharat
Lata Ganesh Kharat
Manisha Purushottam Sultane
Purushottam Dilip Sultane
Sonu @ Sonam Dhanajay Awtade
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vishal Ganesh Kharat (Case 68/2024) The court acquitted all six defendants of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to spouse), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 504 (intentional insult) with Section 34 (common intention). The prosecution failed to establish its case through the complainant's testimony and one witness, as their evidence lacked corroboration and the accused denied the allegations. The court noted the parties had reached a settlement, and finding insufficient evidence of domestic harassment, physical abuse, or insult, ordered the acquittal and cancellation of bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vishal Ganesh Kharat (Case 68/2024) The court acquitted all six defendants of charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to spouse), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 504 (intentional insult) with Section 34 (common intention). The prosecution failed to establish its case through the complainant's testimony and one witness, as their evidence lacked corroboration and the accused denied the allegations. The court noted the parties had reached a settlement, and finding insufficient evidence of domestic harassment, physical abuse, or insult, ordered the acquittal and cancellation of bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts