Prashant Candrakant Aru vs State Through Police Station Washim Rural Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor — 50/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHWS080005002026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
389/2026
Filing Date
14-03-2026
Registration No
50/2026
Registration Date
16-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
Police Station
P.S.Washim. Rural
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prashant Candrakant Aru
Adv. Adv. Vinod Borkar
Respondent(s)
State Through Police Station Washim Rural Advocate - Assistant Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
Disposed
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 50/2026 Court Decision: The court granted petitioner Prashant Candrakant Aru's application under CrPC §497 and §503 (2023) for release of his seized red LMV trolley (registration MH-28-E-8815, chassis VFW.821.01.2014, valued at ₹5,00,000) in case FIR 173/2026 under IPC §303(2). The court ordered return of the trolley on an interim basis against a ₹5,00,000 security bond, with conditions that the petitioner maintain the vehicle's original condition and produce it whenever required by the court. Key Reasoning: The investigator consented to release, no other claimant existed for the trolley, petitioner demonstrated ownership documentation, and retention by police risked vehicle deterioration. The trolley was essential for petitioner's agricultural business. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 50/2026 Court Decision: The court granted petitioner Prashant Candrakant Aru's application under CrPC §497 and §503 (2023) for release of his seized red LMV trolley (registration MH-28-E-8815, chassis VFW.821.01.2014, valued at ₹5,00,000) in case FIR 173/2026 under IPC §303(2). The court ordered return of the trolley on an interim basis against a ₹5,00,000 security bond, with conditions that the petitioner maintain the vehicle's original condition and produce it whenever required by the court. Key Reasoning: The investigator consented to release, no other claimant existed for the trolley, petitioner demonstrated ownership documentation, and retention by police risked vehicle deterioration. The trolley was essential for petitioner's agricultural business. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts