Akash Kishor Lokade vs State Through Police Station Officer Risod — 47/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHWS080004632026

e-Filing Number

06-03-2026

Filing Number

363/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

47/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Risod

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

P.S. Risod

Year

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

1.Akash Kishor Lokade

Adv. IRATKAR SAGAR PUNDLIK

Respondent(s)

1.State Through Police Station Officer Risod

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
18-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The court allowed Akash Kishor Lokade's application to recover his seized VIVO Y300 PLUS 5G mobile phone, finding he established ownership through submitted documents and the police did not deny it. The court ordered return of the phone upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs.23,999, with conditions that he cannot sell/transfer it without court permission, must preserve it, and produce it on demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
18-Mar-2026

Disposed

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
16-Mar-2026

Reply/Say

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
11-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
07-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 47/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Akash Kishor Lokade's application to recover his seized VIVO Y300 PLUS 5G mobile phone, finding he established ownership through submitted documents and the police did not deny it. The court ordered return of the phone upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs.23,999, with conditions that he cannot sell/transfer it without court permission, must preserve it, and produce it on demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.