Shridhar So Shivram More vs Suresh Baban Late Advocate - DESHMUKH PRASHANT SHRIPADRAO — 1200034/2015
Case under Specific Relief Act Section SuitforDeclarationandPermanentInjunction. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS080004512015
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
Filing Number
1200070/2015
Filing Date
09-06-2015
Registration No
1200034/2015
Registration Date
09-06-2015
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shridhar So Shivram More
Adv. UNDAL MADANRAO KUNDLIKRAO
Respondent(s)
Suresh Baban Late Advocate - DESHMUKH PRASHANT SHRIPADRAO
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 34/2015 Outcome: Application ALLOWED with conditions. The court permitted plaintiff Shridhar More to amend the property boundaries in his permanent injunction suit against Suresh Deshmukh, correcting four typographical errors in the original plaint. The court found the amendments to be corrective rather than substantive changes, noting the trial had not commenced in real sense since cross-examination remained pending. The plaintiff must effect amendments within 14 days and pay Rs. 500 costs to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 34/2015 Outcome: Application ALLOWED with conditions. The court permitted plaintiff Shridhar More to amend the property boundaries in his permanent injunction suit against Suresh Deshmukh, correcting four typographical errors in the original plaint. The court found the amendments to be corrective rather than substantive changes, noting the trial had not commenced in real sense since cross-examination remained pending. The plaintiff must effect amendments within 14 days and pay Rs. 500 costs to the defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts