Kishor Shankar Lokade vs State Through Police Station Officer Risod — 41/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHWS080004182026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

28-02-2026

Filing Number

325/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

41/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Risod

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

Police Station

P.S. Risod

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

Kishor Shankar Lokade

Adv. IRATKAR SAGAR PUNDLIK

Respondent(s)

State Through Police Station Officer Risod

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

18-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Reply/Say

10-03-2026

Reply/Say

07-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Cri.M.A. No. 41/2026 The court allowed Kishor Shankar Lokade's application under BNSS sections 497 and 503 to recover his seized VIVO V60 mobile phone, finding he established ownership through FIR, Aadhar card, and mobile bill documents. The court reasoned that since investigation was complete, the IO did not dispute ownership, and retaining the phone risked deterioration, returning it served no investigative purpose. The phone was ordered released upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 38,999, with conditions that the applicant not sell/transfer it without court permission, maintain it properly, and produce it when directed. The IO was directed to photograph the device and prepare a panchnama before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cri.M.A. No. 41/2026 The court allowed Kishor Shankar Lokade's application under BNSS sections 497 and 503 to recover his seized VIVO V60 mobile phone, finding he established ownership through FIR, Aadhar card, and mobile bill documents. The court reasoned that since investigation was complete, the IO did not dispute ownership, and retaining the phone risked deterioration, returning it served no investigative purpose. The phone was ordered released upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 38,999, with conditions that the applicant not sell/transfer it without court permission, maintain it properly, and produce it when directed. The IO was directed to photograph the device and prepare a panchnama before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division,Risod All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case