Sagar Pandit Mokale vs State Through Police Station Risod — 30/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 23rd March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHWS080004012026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

315/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

30/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Risod

Judge

7-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

Police Station

P.S. Risod

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

Sagar Pandit Mokale

Adv. TAVSHIFUDDIN KAISARUDDIN

Respondent(s)

State Through Police Station Risod

Hearing History

Judge: 7-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod

23-03-2026

Disposed

18-03-2026

Reply/Say

16-03-2026

Reply/Say

12-03-2026

Reply/Say

07-03-2026

Notice Ready

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 30/2026 Summary: The court granted Sagar Pandit Mokale's application for interim custody of his Swift Astar Car seized in Crime No. 980/2025, finding no purpose in detaining the vehicle at the police station during investigation. The court imposed strict conditions including an Rs. 8,00,000 bond, prohibition on altering the vehicle's form or transferring it without court permission, and required production of the vehicle as needed by the court and investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 30/2026 Summary: The court granted Sagar Pandit Mokale's application for interim custody of his Swift Astar Car seized in Crime No. 980/2025, finding no purpose in detaining the vehicle at the police station during investigation. The court imposed strict conditions including an Rs. 8,00,000 bond, prohibition on altering the vehicle's form or transferring it without court permission, and required production of the vehicle as needed by the court and investigating officer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division,Risod All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case