Maroti Fakira Thakare vs State Through Police Station Officer Risod — 32/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHWS080003982026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

312/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division,Risod

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

Police Station

P.S. Risod

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

Maroti Fakira Thakare

Adv. TAVSHIFUDDIN KAISARUDDIN

Respondent(s)

State Through Police Station Officer Risod

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.

16-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Hearing

09-03-2026

Reply/Say

07-03-2026

Reply/Say

02-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: Cri.M.A. No. 32/2026 (Maroti Fakira Thakare v. State) The court allowed Maroti Thakare's application for release of his seized Mahindra Bolero vehicle, finding him the rightful owner based on registration and identity documents. The court rejected the police's objections regarding evidence preservation, reasoning that prolonged police custody would damage the vehicle's value and serve no practical purpose. The vehicle was released subject to conditions: a Rs. 5 lakh indemnity bond, undertaking not to sell/transfer without court permission, maintaining the vehicle in good condition, and producing it in court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Cri.M.A. No. 32/2026 (Maroti Fakira Thakare v. State) The court allowed Maroti Thakare's application for release of his seized Mahindra Bolero vehicle, finding him the rightful owner based on registration and identity documents. The court rejected the police's objections regarding evidence preservation, reasoning that prolonged police custody would damage the vehicle's value and serve no practical purpose. The vehicle was released subject to conditions: a Rs. 5 lakh indemnity bond, undertaking not to sell/transfer without court permission, maintaining the vehicle in good condition, and producing it in court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division,Risod All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case