Maroti Fakira Thakare vs State Through Police Station Officer Risod — 32/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHWS080003982026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2026
Filing Number
312/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
32/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
P.S. Risod
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Maroti Fakira Thakare
Adv. TAVSHIFUDDIN KAISARUDDIN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State Through Police Station Officer Risod
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: Cri.M.A. No. 32/2026 (Maroti Fakira Thakare v. State) The court allowed Maroti Thakare's application for release of his seized Mahindra Bolero vehicle, finding him the rightful owner based on registration and identity documents. The court rejected the police's objections regarding evidence preservation, reasoning that prolonged police custody would damage the vehicle's value and serve no practical purpose. The vehicle was released subject to conditions: a Rs. 5 lakh indemnity bond, undertaking not to sell/transfer without court permission, maintaining the vehicle in good condition, and producing it in court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
09-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
07-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
02-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 32/2026
Summary: Cri.M.A. No. 32/2026 (Maroti Fakira Thakare v. State) The court allowed Maroti Thakare's application for release of his seized Mahindra Bolero vehicle, finding him the rightful owner based on registration and identity documents. The court rejected the police's objections regarding evidence preservation, reasoning that prolonged police custody would damage the vehicle's value and serve no practical purpose. The vehicle was released subject to conditions: a Rs. 5 lakh indemnity bond, undertaking not to sell/transfer without court permission, maintaining the vehicle in good condition, and producing it in court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts