ASMABEE SHEKH SOHIL vs FAIMIDA BEE SHOUKATYARKHAA Advocate - TAVSHIFODDIN KAISARODDIN — 43/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 383. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHWS080003792025
e-Filing Number
28-02-2025
Filing Number
79/2025
Filing Date
01-Mar-2025
Registration No
43/2025
Registration Date
01-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASMABEE SHEKH SOHIL
Adv. BHARAD NUTAN BHARAT
-
2.SHEKH ISRAR SHEKH ABRAR
Adv. BHARAD NUTAN BHARAT
-
3.SAMINABEE SHEKH RAJIK
Adv. BHARAD NUTAN BHARAT
-
4.SHEKH REHMAN SHEKH ABRAR
Adv. BHARAD NUTAN BHARAT
-
5.FARJANA BEE SHEKH VASIM
Adv. BHARAD NUTAN BHARAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.FAIMIDA BEE SHOUKATYARKHAA Advocate - TAVSHIFODDIN KAISARODDIN
-
2.MOHAMMADYARKHAA SHOUKATYARKHAA
-
3.JAMIRYARKHAA SHOUKATYARKHAA
-
4.RIJWANA BEE NIYAMATKHAA
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Order on Exh
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
29-Apr-2026
Order on Exh
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
04-Apr-2026
Order on Exh
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
16-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
03-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
23-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
07-Jan-2026
Order on Exh
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
20-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
26-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
17-Nov-2025
Compliance
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
31-Oct-2025
Compliance
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
14-Oct-2025
Compliance
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
26-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted the petition filed by Asmabee Shekh Sohil, Shekh Israr Shekh Abrar, and Saminabee Shekh Rajik (Respondents 1-3). The three respondents were directed to file written replies to the petition within a specified timeframe; upon failure to do so, they were each imposed a fine of Rs. 200. The court ordered that the petition proceed and the respondents file their written responses as directed, with the fine to be adjusted against court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Sep-2025
Compliance
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
09-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
15-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
16-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
28-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
28-Mar-2025
Awaiting Notice
Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
-
03-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 43/2025
The court granted the petition filed by Asmabee Shekh Sohil, Shekh Israr Shekh Abrar, and Saminabee Shekh Rajik (Respondents 1-3). The three respondents were directed to file written replies to the petition within a specified timeframe; upon failure to do so, they were each imposed a fine of Rs. 200. The court ordered that the petition proceed and the respondents file their written responses as directed, with the fine to be adjusted against court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts