ASMABEE SHEKH SOHIL vs FAIMIDA BEE SHOUKATYARKHAA Advocate - TAVSHIFODDIN KAISARODDIN — 43/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 383. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHWS080003792025
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
e-Filing Number
28-02-2025
Filing Number
79/2025
Filing Date
01-03-2025
Registration No
43/2025
Registration Date
01-03-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASMABEE SHEKH SOHIL
Adv. BHARAD NUTAN BHARAT
SHEKH ISRAR SHEKH ABRAR
Adv. BHARAD NUTAN BHARAT
SAMINABEE SHEKH RAJIK
Adv. BHARAD NUTAN BHARAT
SHEKH REHMAN SHEKH ABRAR
Adv. BHARAD NUTAN BHARAT
FARJANA BEE SHEKH VASIM
Adv. BHARAD NUTAN BHARAT
Respondent(s)
FAIMIDA BEE SHOUKATYARKHAA Advocate - TAVSHIFODDIN KAISARODDIN
MOHAMMADYARKHAA SHOUKATYARKHAA
JAMIRYARKHAA SHOUKATYARKHAA
RIJWANA BEE NIYAMATKHAA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 29-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 04-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 03-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
The court granted the petition filed by Asmabee Shekh Sohil, Shekh Israr Shekh Abrar, and Saminabee Shekh Rajik (Respondents 1-3). The three respondents were directed to file written replies to the petition within a specified timeframe; upon failure to do so, they were each imposed a fine of Rs. 200. The court ordered that the petition proceed and the respondents file their written responses as directed, with the fine to be adjusted against court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted the petition filed by Asmabee Shekh Sohil, Shekh Israr Shekh Abrar, and Saminabee Shekh Rajik (Respondents 1-3). The three respondents were directed to file written replies to the petition within a specified timeframe; upon failure to do so, they were each imposed a fine of Rs. 200. The court ordered that the petition proceed and the respondents file their written responses as directed, with the fine to be adjusted against court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts