MOTIRAM GOVINDA CHAVAN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA POLICE STATION RISOD — 26/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 08th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHWS080003472026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2026
Filing Number
276/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
26/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
Police Station
P.S. Risod
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOTIRAM GOVINDA CHAVAN
Adv. DESHMUKH GAJANAN GAMBHIRRAO
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA POLICE STATION RISOD
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod.
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 01-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 24-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Cri.M.A. No. 26/2026 Court Decision: The court allowed Motiram Govinda Chavan's application and ordered the release of his seized Eicher tractor and LMV trailer (detained in Crime No. 119/2026 for mining regulation violations) upon execution of a ₹5 lakh indemnity bond. The court rejected the police's objections, finding that the applicant proved ownership, had paid penalties (₹1,12,150), and that prolonged police custody posed risk of property deterioration with no investigative purpose remaining. Key Conditions: The applicant must not sell or transfer the property without court permission, maintain it in good condition, and produce it when directed. The investigating officer was ordered to photograph and document the vehicle's condition before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri.M.A. No. 26/2026 Court Decision: The court allowed Motiram Govinda Chavan's application and ordered the release of his seized Eicher tractor and LMV trailer (detained in Crime No. 119/2026 for mining regulation violations) upon execution of a ₹5 lakh indemnity bond. The court rejected the police's objections, finding that the applicant proved ownership, had paid penalties (₹1,12,150), and that prolonged police custody posed risk of property deterioration with no investigative purpose remaining. Key Conditions: The applicant must not sell or transfer the property without court permission, maintain it in good condition, and produce it when directed. The investigating officer was ordered to photograph and document the vehicle's condition before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts