Jaya Surendra Khandare vs Surendra Vasanta Khandaree Advocate - DESHPANDE SUSHIL SAKHARAM — 64/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHWS080002662023
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2023
Filing Number
219/2023
Filing Date
27-02-2023
Registration No
64/2023
Registration Date
27-02-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jaya Surendra Khandare
Adv. MAHAJAN DATTA VAIJANATH
Sujay Surendra Khandare
Adv. MAHAJAN DATTA VAIJANATH
Respondent(s)
Surendra Vasanta Khandaree Advocate - DESHPANDE SUSHIL SAKHARAM
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 16-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 28-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 15-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 06-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case 64/2023 Summary Outcome: Petition partially allowed. The court granted interim maintenance to petitioner Jaya Surendra Khandare of ₹2,000/month and to the minor child Sujay of ₹1,000/month from the respondent, pending final resolution of the case. Key Facts: The petitioner alleged domestic violence, physical and mental abuse, and financial exploitation by the respondent husband during their marriage (since 2018). The respondent contested the claims and challenged the child's paternity, with both parties filing counter-accusations including infidelity allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 64/2023 Summary Outcome: Petition partially allowed. The court granted interim maintenance to petitioner Jaya Surendra Khandare of ₹2,000/month and to the minor child Sujay of ₹1,000/month from the respondent, pending final resolution of the case. Key Facts: The petitioner alleged domestic violence, physical and mental abuse, and financial exploitation by the respondent husband during their marriage (since 2018). The respondent contested the claims and challenged the child's paternity, with both parties filing counter-accusations including infidelity allegations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts