State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Shirpur vs Premila Pandurang Thakare — 6/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420. Disposed: Contested--DISCHARGED on 16th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS080002392010
Filing Number
1200005/2010
Filing Date
12-01-2010
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
12-01-2010
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
7-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISCHARGED
FIR Details
FIR Number
38
Police Station
P. S. Shirpur
Year
1999
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O. Shirpur
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Premila Pandurang Thakare
Hearing History
Judge: 7-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C.Risod
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant ( Dormant Case )
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-12-2025 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 28-09-2025 | Awaiting Warrant ( Dormant Case ) |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Premila Pandurang Thakare (Case 6/2026) The court acquitted defendant Premila Pandurang Thakare of cheating charges under IPC Section 420. The prosecution alleged she fraudulently obtained ₹7,000 by promising to secure college admission and scholarships for the complainant's niece, but failed to do so. However, the court found insufficient evidence: the sole prosecution witness (complainant's sister) provided no substantive testimony supporting the fraud allegations, and critical witnesses had died. The court concluded the prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Premila Pandurang Thakare (Case 6/2026) The court acquitted defendant Premila Pandurang Thakare of cheating charges under IPC Section 420. The prosecution alleged she fraudulently obtained ₹7,000 by promising to secure college admission and scholarships for the complainant's niece, but failed to do so. However, the court found insufficient evidence: the sole prosecution witness (complainant's sister) provided no substantive testimony supporting the fraud allegations, and critical witnesses had died. The court concluded the prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts