State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Shirpur vs Sonaba Prabhakarrao Deshmukh Advocate - Adv. Bonde — 16/2024
Case under Arms Act Section 4,25. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHWS080001702024
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
141/2024
Filing Date
23-01-2024
Registration No
16/2024
Registration Date
23-01-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division,Risod
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
FIR Details
FIR Number
6
Police Station
P. S. Shirpur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through P.S.O. Shirpur
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sonaba Prabhakarrao Deshmukh Advocate - Adv. Bonde
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D.J.M.F.C.Risod.
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-05-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 20-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Cri. M.A. No. 16/2024 (Sonbarao v/s State) The applicant sought interim custody of a seized Hero Passion Pro motorcycle allegedly used in committing offences under Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. The Judicial Magistrate rejected the application, holding that the vehicle constitutes evidence directly connected to the serious crime and that releasing it risked its sale or concealment. The court noted a dangerous weapon (Gupti) was recovered from the accused during the vehicle's search, no valid license was provided, and a chargesheet had already been filed showing prima facie substance against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri. M.A. No. 16/2024 (Sonbarao v/s State) The applicant sought interim custody of a seized Hero Passion Pro motorcycle allegedly used in committing offences under Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act, 1959. The Judicial Magistrate rejected the application, holding that the vehicle constitutes evidence directly connected to the serious crime and that releasing it risked its sale or concealment. The court noted a dangerous weapon (Gupti) was recovered from the accused during the vehicle's search, no valid license was provided, and a chargesheet had already been filed showing prima facie substance against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts