Shripad Sachinappa NimbalwarRepresented by Guardian -Sau. Sarika Sachinappa Nimbalwar vs Prashant Uttamrao Dahake — 87/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 15. Disposed: Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER on 16th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS070024912016
Filing Number
191/2016
Filing Date
23-12-2016
Registration No
87/2016
Registration Date
23-12-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Karanja
Judge
3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shripad Sachinappa NimbalwarRepresented by Guardian -Sau. Sarika Sachinappa Nimbalwar
Adv. Faruk S. Khan
Respondent(s)
Prashant Uttamrao Dahake
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Disposed
Report
Report
Report
Report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-02-2026 | Report |
| 03-01-2026 | Report |
| 24-11-2025 | Report |
| 13-10-2025 | Report |
Interim Orders
Case 87/2016 Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to appoint a court commissioner (TILR, Karanja Lad) to conduct a joint measurement of survey no. 42 involving both parties' adjacent agricultural fields. The court found that a comprehensive boundary measurement was necessary to determine whether the defendant had unlawfully encroached on the plaintiff's land, as the previous partial measurement had created ambiguity. The commissioner was directed to submit a survey report by April 23, 2023, with costs borne by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 87/2016 Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to appoint a court commissioner (TILR, Karanja Lad) to conduct a joint measurement of survey no. 42 involving both parties' adjacent agricultural fields. The court found that a comprehensive boundary measurement was necessary to determine whether the defendant had unlawfully encroached on the plaintiff's land, as the previous partial measurement had created ambiguity. The commissioner was directed to submit a survey report by April 23, 2023, with costs borne by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts