Mahadeorao Arjun Wasnik vs Prashant Devendra Ghule Advocate - WADEKAR DILIP GANGADHAR — 86/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER on 16th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS070024532016
Filing Number
190/2016
Filing Date
21-12-2016
Registration No
86/2016
Registration Date
21-12-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Karanja
Judge
3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahadeorao Arjun Wasnik
Adv. WASNIK SAGAR MAHADEORAO
Respondent(s)
Prashant Devendra Ghule Advocate - WADEKAR DILIP GANGADHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-02-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 22-01-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 22-12-2025 | Dismissal Order |
| 25-11-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The court rejected the plaintiff's application to add the owners of Survey Nos. 28 and 30 as defendants under Order I Rule 10(2) of the CPC. The court found that these proposed defendants were not necessary parties to the suit and that effective orders could be passed without their impleadment, as there was no specific prayer against them in the pleadings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected the plaintiff's application to add the owners of Survey Nos. 28 and 30 as defendants under Order I Rule 10(2) of the CPC. The court found that these proposed defendants were not necessary parties to the suit and that effective orders could be passed without their impleadment, as there was no specific prayer against them in the pleadings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts