Taibai Namdeo Lokhande vs Gajanan Vitthal Dhongade Advocate - BIYANI GAURAV VINODKUMARJI — 70/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 35. Disposed: Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER on 17th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHWS070020392017
Filing Number
142/2017
Filing Date
27-09-2017
Registration No
70/2017
Registration Date
27-09-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Karanja
Judge
3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--TRANSFERRED / MADE OVER
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Taibai Namdeo Lokhande
Adv. KHANDAGALE ARUN ANNASAHEB
Bhagwan Mukaji Lokhande
Adv. KHANDAGALE ARUN ANNASAHEB
Respondent(s)
Gajanan Vitthal Dhongade Advocate - BIYANI GAURAV VINODKUMARJI
Dnyaneshwar Vitthal Dhongade
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Karanja
Disposed
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 13-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 15-01-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 24-12-2025 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 70/2017 The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the "No Cross-examination" order dated 23/06/2023, which was passed when neither the defendants nor their advocate appeared for the scheduled cross-examination of PW-1. While acknowledging the defendants' lack of diligence, the court prioritized deciding the matter on merit by granting one opportunity for cross-examination. However, the court imposed costs of Rs.700 on the defendants to compensate the plaintiffs for the inconvenience caused by the repeated adjournments and lack of timely prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 70/2017 The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the "No Cross-examination" order dated 23/06/2023, which was passed when neither the defendants nor their advocate appeared for the scheduled cross-examination of PW-1. While acknowledging the defendants' lack of diligence, the court prioritized deciding the matter on merit by granting one opportunity for cross-examination. However, the court imposed costs of Rs.700 on the defendants to compensate the plaintiffs for the inconvenience caused by the repeated adjournments and lack of timely prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts